New recipe magazines are few and far between. For the past five years, I've contented myself with a subscription (courtesy of my mom and my friend Janet) to
Taste of Home's "
Simple and Delicious" magazine (formerly "Quick Cooking"), which lives up to both its previous and current names.
I was gleeful, however, to find a new magazine several months ago, a big, colorful, innovatively-paginated delight called, simply, "EAT." Produced by the folks who are responsible for "
Better Homes and Gardens," the magazine boasted pictures of every recipe inside, and a bright, attractive format. My main quibble was an overemphasis on cooking for kids, but that's not a big deal.
My astute mother-in-law got me a subscription after seeing my excitement at finding the second issue on the newsstand, and I eagerly pawed through both issues I received. Two cooking magazine subscriptions = twice the joy!
Then a few months went by with no magazine. I was mystified until I got a note in the mail informing me that the magazine died, but in its place, I would get a whopping 3-year subscription to Better Homes and Gardens! So all is well, right?
In short, I miss EAT. It was just a good magazine. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy my subscription to "Simple and Delicious" very much, but it was just a nice bonus each month to get a second magazine targeted at cooking.
"Better Homes and Gardens" has but a small section of recipes, most of which so far have been either
unappealing or
wildly impractical.
But of course, they have other features - features for improving your Home and your Garden.
Ladies, and gentlemen, my Home is 650 square feet. I'm not allowed to paint the walls. I'm not allowed to drill holes in the walls. Sure, there are some ways I could make my Home better, and the cleaning advice in the magazine is somewhat helpful. But advice on
how to create a family crafts room is, well, let's just call it
completely irrelevant to my situation.
And as for the Gardens component, well, this is my Garden:

I'll grant you, it could be Better. Much Better. But it will never be the vast English-garden-inspired Mecca complete with water features, a gazebo, and multiple walking paths they profile in the August issue.
In short, the magazine is dramatically different from EAT, and I can't imagine why they would assume it would be an acceptable substitute. I mean, on the face of it, a 3-year subscription to make up for a lost 1-year subscription is pretty nice, but it's kind of like someone taking away my chocolate bar and handing me some black licorice, and saying "But we're giving you a whole king-sized PACK of black licorice, so it's a better deal." No, it's not. I'd much rather have my chocolate bar, and having LOTS of stuff I dislike doesn't make up for losing a smaller amount of something I like.
Next time, Better Homes and Gardens, at least offer the OPTION of a refund for lost issues, or perhaps send one of your cookbooks as a replacement offer instead.